Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive45.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170623
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateDec 15 '18 at 19:32
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600-$133
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Memory 86.5
1-Core 108
2-Core 208
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 437
58% 432 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 141
Reflection 145
Parallax 126
115% 137 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 133
Splatting 104
94% 116 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 75 95 73 100 33 MB/s
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.2% Average
Read 214
Write 158
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 82.7
27% 121 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 96.3
4K Mixed 14.4
92% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 66.3
DQ Mixed 29.1
42% 79.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 86%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
17GB free
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 64 51 45 57 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 260
Write 286
Mixed 236
SusWrite 57.6
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 71.7
4K Mixed 9.4
75% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 18
67% 144 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 86%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
858GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 58 57 58 57 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 81.2
Write 44
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 57.1
41% 55.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 58%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
931GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 191 194 193 193 194 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 48% Great: 112%
PLATINUM My Drive 2.5" 1TB
625GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 97 97 96 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
40% Average
Read 98
Write 96.5
Mixed 37
SusWrite 96.7
109% 82.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 40%
Great: 48%
ST2000DM 001-1CH164 2TB
238GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 91 90 88 90 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 130
Write 86.5
Mixed 74
SusWrite 89.5
122% 95 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 66%
WDC WD50 01AALS-00L3B2 500GB
466GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 92 90 88 90 91 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.6% Below average
Read 94.3
Write 92.3
Mixed 66
SusWrite 89.6
115% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.9% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 24.9
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 21
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 14,154 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $884
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback