Gateway FX6860

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGateway FX6860  (all builds)
MotherboardGateway FX6860
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110419
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateDec 18 '18 at 00:52
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$188
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 95.7
2-Core 172
72% 120 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 460
48% 383 Pts
64-Core 465
29% 465 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5750
Sapphire(174B EA60) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
9.12% Terrible
Lighting 11.9
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 9.91
10% 10.4 fps
MRender 9.05
Gravity 8.5
Splatting 11
8% 9.53 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.12%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
243GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 91 67 90 96 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 108
Write 113
Mixed 59.2
SusWrite 86.7
67% 91.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 70%
WD WD2003FYPS-27W9B 2TB
173GB free
Firmware: 04.05G11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 54 53 55 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 57
Write 54.3
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 53.2
38% 51.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 61%
Generic- SD/MMC 32GB
27GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 5 5 5 5.1 5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
4.33% Terrible
Read 18.6
Write 5.3
Mixed 2.3
SusWrite 4.9
8% 7.78 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
9% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.33%
Great: 17%
Ut165 USB2FlashStorage 4GB
3GB free, PID 0165
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 4.3 4.2 4.2 4 4.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
3.66% Terrible
Read 14.8
Write 3
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 4
7% 6.52 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.66%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unifosa GU512303EP0202 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
48.9% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 14.9
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 16.9
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FX6860 Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Gateway FX6860

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $273
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback