HP Pavilion dm1 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Pavilion dm1 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1611
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 08 '16 at 23:58
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-350
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Memory 53.5
1-Core 19.7
2-Core 38.7
27% 37.3 Pts
4-Core 39.2
8-Core 39.5
5% 39.3 Pts
64-Core 38.9
2% 38.9 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310
HP(103C 1611) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.792.0.0
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.89% Terrible
Lighting 1.03
Reflection 1.42
Parallax 1.28
1% 1.25 fps
MRender 1.48
Gravity 0.63
Splatting 1.43
1% 1.18 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.89%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS13 11 240GB SSD
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS13 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 461
Write 413
Mixed 461
99% 445 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 7.12
4K Mixed 6.06
25% 7.29 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 88%
USB 2.0 Flash Drive 16GB
10GB free, PID 0000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
3.4% Terrible
Read 10.7
Write 7.05
Mixed 8.14
10% 8.64 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.008
4K Mixed 0.01
5% 0.41 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.4%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 4.9
12% 4.37 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 3
8% 2.9 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion dm1 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion dm1 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback