| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 44.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H61M-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.4 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140721 |
| Uptime | 4.3 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 05 '19 at 16:41 |
| Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 39% |
PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
63.2%
Good
|
65% 101 Pts
|
24% 177 Pts
|
12% 186 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R7 370-$153
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.12.3
|
26.4%
Poor
|
26% 34.5 fps
|
28% 32.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 608ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 73 79 80 85 68 MB/s
|
44.4%
Average
|
26% 114 MB/s
|
90% 31.8 MB/s
|
69% 106 MB/s
|
|
Samsung SP1614C 160GB-$98
26GB free
Firmware: SW100-34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 54 54 55 53 39 MB/s
|
30%
Below average
|
36% 49.3 MB/s
|
155% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5474-028.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1400 MHz
|
25.8%
Poor
|
23% 8 GB/s
|
12% 4.23 GB/s
|
77% 51.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-K Builds (Compare 2,322 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H61M-K - $140
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 332x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 265x |
| Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 188x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 441x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 146x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 112x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $227 |