MSI MPG Z390M GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7B50)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics58.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B50
MotherboardMSI MPG Z390M GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7B50)  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181114
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 05 '19 at 17:15
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$137
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Memory 91.2
1-Core 139
2-Core 279
94% 170 Pts
4-Core 552
8-Core 737
82% 644 Pts
64-Core 795
49% 795 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.7% Above average
Lighting 74.2
Reflection 74
Parallax 64.9
60% 71 fps
MRender 69.6
Gravity 69.3
Splatting 64.7
55% 67.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 256GB-$49
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0801A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 27 35 61 42 26 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 500
Write 459
Mixed 428
SusWrite 82.3
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 93
4K Mixed 45.5
157% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 134
146% 241 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87%
Great: 118%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 238GB
32GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 38 39 39 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.7% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 38.3
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 38.7
8% 37.5 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 16.6
4K Mixed 13.5
45% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 13.1
DQ Write 19.8
DQ Mixed 1.3
5% 11.4 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 101%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 919GB
231GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 5.3 5.3 5.1 5.2 5.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.7% Below average
Read 116
Write 109
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 5.3
47% 64.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 69%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 79GB
74GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.4 5.2 5.1 5.2 7.4 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 154
Write 31.2
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 5.5
42% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 46%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 116GB
38GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 5.3 5.2 5.1 5.1 5.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.9% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 32.7
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 5.2
17% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 51%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 429GB
393GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5.3 5.3 5.2 5.1 5.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 30
Write 30
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 5.2
17% 22.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Goodram GR2133D464L15/8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
77.5% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 24.6
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 23.6
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG Z390M GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7B50) Builds (Compare 2,295 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z390M GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7B50)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 116% - Outstanding Total price: $612
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback