| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 34.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 57.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock 990FX Extreme9 (all builds) |
| Memory | 55.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130104 |
| Uptime | 1.7 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 06 '19 at 18:29 |
| Run Duration | 146 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
68.1%
Good
|
62% 104 Pts
|
44% 361 Pts
|
26% 419 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 280X-$500
PwrHis(1787 2317) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
34.2%
Below average
|
36% 44.8 fps
|
30% 36.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
337GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 275 229 224 245 212 MB/s
|
57.2%
Above average
|
57% 255 MB/s
|
91% 32 MB/s
|
33% 48.7 MB/s
|
|
Mushkin Chronos 120GB-$70
644GB free
Firmware: 332ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 301 301 390 301 312 MB/s
|
79.7%
Very good
|
58% 262 MB/s
|
121% 42.6 MB/s
|
120% 162 MB/s
|
|
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
5.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 95 100 97 98 94 MB/s
|
63.9%
Good
|
75% 102 MB/s
|
175% 1.4 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
46.5%
Average
|
48% 16.7 GB/s
|
28% 9.83 GB/s
|
56% 71.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 990FX Extreme9 Builds (Compare 104 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme9 - $218
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 48x |
| FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples | 27x |
| FX-9370AMD $194Bench 62%, 9,054 samples | 10x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 8x |
| R9 290AMD $399Bench 46%, 68,699 samples | 5x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $638 |