Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics34.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDell Precision Tower 5810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 5810  (all builds)
Memory120.9 GB free of 127.996 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160911
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 07 '19 at 14:14
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 86.3
1-Core 111
2-Core 196
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 598
65% 516 Pts
64-Core 600
37% 600 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 83%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.33
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Lighting 41.6
Reflection 40.7
Parallax 37
34% 39.8 fps
MRender 51
Gravity 37.3
Splatting 40
35% 42.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM87 256GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 306 270 254 202 247 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 453
Write 459
Mixed 391
SusWrite 270
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 50.7
180% 64.8 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 264
202% 269 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
788GB free
Firmware: A810
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 181 181 187 187 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 189
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 183
108% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KCPC7G-MIA 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB RIMM 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
94.7% Outstanding
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 42.6
MC Mixed 35.3
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 19.6
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,326 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback