Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 55% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180824
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '19 at 02:40
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$403 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	86.8% Excellent	Memory 91.9 1-Core 136 2-Core 244 89% 157 Pts	4-Core 438 8-Core 895 78% 667 Pts	64-Core 1,599 99% 1,599 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85F3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2256 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	55.3% Above average	Lighting 66.1 Reflection 66.5 Parallax 63.5 54% 65.4 fps	MRender 76.4 Gravity 66.6 Splatting 70 58% 71 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 131GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 230 187 145 139 139 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	81.1% Excellent	Read 444 Write 404 Mixed 343 SusWrite 195 78% 346 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 58.5 4K Mixed 36.3 118% 40.5 MB/s	DQ Read 356 DQ Write 298 DQ Mixed 325 244% 326 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 719GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 451 456 409 410 412 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	92.7% Outstanding	Read 408 Write 379 Mixed 368 SusWrite 425 89% 395 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 59.7 4K Mixed 34.6 115% 40.1 MB/s	DQ Read 356 DQ Write 301 DQ Mixed 323 243% 327 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 133%
Gigabyte UD PRO 512GB-$47 3,305 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 287GB free Firmware: SAFM13.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 182 207 206 207 207 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Read 463 Write 338 Mixed 299 SusWrite 232 74% 333 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 58.6 4K Mixed 17.7 83% 31.9 MB/s	DQ Read 137 DQ Write 26.2 DQ Mixed 84 61% 82.5 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 104%
Gigabyte UD PRO 512GB-$47 3,305 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 477GB free Firmware: SAFM13.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 234 225 224 226 226 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	Read 398 Write 360 Mixed 317 SusWrite 254 75% 332 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 47.6 4K Mixed 24.1 85% 30.3 MB/s	DQ Read 337 DQ Write 282 DQ Mixed 175 168% 265 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown AR32C16S8K2SU416R 2x8GB 3,827 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	67.9% Good	MC Read 26.6 MC Write 25.7 MC Mixed 19.5 68% 23.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 25.2 SC Mixed 18.8 56% 19.6 GB/s	Latency 64.3 62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 8,533 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $349

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $403Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	4,881x
Core i7-9700KIntel $265Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,614x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $294Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	560x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,307x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	651x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	642x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	859x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	569x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	489x

RAM
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	289x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	280x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	255x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $1,289

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16