Nvidia MCP7A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardNvidia MCP7A  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091009
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 15 '19 at 14:10
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400-$100
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
36% Below average
Memory 51
1-Core 37.7
2-Core 73.2
34% 54 Pts
4-Core 121
8-Core 135
17% 128 Pts
64-Core 142
9% 142 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9300 / nForce 730i
Zotac(19DA 0AE5) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.72% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 1.54
Parallax 0.34
1% 0.89 fps
MRender 1.29
Gravity 0.67
Splatting 1.13
1% 1.03 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.72%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM000-SSHD-8GB 500GB
387GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LVD5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 27 22 17 26 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 15.6
Write 44.6
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 22.8
23% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
68% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
MC Read 3.2
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 2.7
10% 3.47 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 2.6
9% 3.2 GB/s
Latency 157
26% 157 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MCP7A Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Nvidia MCP7A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $113
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback