Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime7 Days
Run DateJan 16 '19 at 02:17
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-9600 APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Memory 70.2
1-Core 72.7
2-Core 139
56% 93.9 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 211
27% 205 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 8616) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1797 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Lighting 35.9
Reflection 25.2
Parallax 34.8
29% 32 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 33
Splatting 31.9
28% 34.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 505ABBF1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 70 70 46 23 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 366
Write 83.4
Mixed 122
SusWrite 58.6
34% 158 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 52.9
4K Mixed 28.4
105% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 78.9
DQ Mixed 86.1
67% 92.4 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$35
680GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 161 158 163 164 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 150
Mixed 32.9
SusWrite 162
93% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata CMV4GX4M1A2133C15 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.6% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 13.2
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 8.9
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,609 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback