bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive89% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '19 at 00:07
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Memory 71.3
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 194
68% 121 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 193
26% 194 Pts
64-Core 193
12% 193 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 34GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 211 209 209 208 209 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 412
Write 315
Mixed 396
SusWrite 208
75% 333 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 68.8
4K Mixed 42.1
140% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 278
233% 337 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 89%
Great: 89%
VendorCo ProductCode 16GB
11GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 3.9 4.2 4.2 4.2 3.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 5.8
Write 3.5
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 3.7
6% 4.33 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0
1% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-4096MB 1x4GB
1 of 128 slots used
4GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
MC Read 33.4
MC Write 35.5
MC Mixed 32.8
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 26.5
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 98.5
41% 98.5 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback