Asus CM6870

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAsus CM6870  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CM6870
Memory13.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 22 '16 at 11:41
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450-$95
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 96.5
2-Core 193
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 366
49% 366 Pts
64-Core 367
23% 367 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Asus HD 7350
Asus(1043 041F) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.930.0.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.18% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2.54
Parallax 1.62
1% 1.85 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.78
1% 1.51 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.18%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 388
Write 369
Mixed 297
78% 351 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 59.3
4K Mixed 22.4
104% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 32.9
DQ Write 78.3
DQ Mixed 23.2
27% 44.8 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
809GB free
Firmware: JC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 106
Write 104
Mixed 31.2
59% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.49
115% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SLA302G08-GGNHC Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 06C1 SLA302G08-GGNHC Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.1% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 18.5
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 18.1
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CM6870 Builds (Compare 654 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CM6870

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback