Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Novatech BB-X000999

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	6.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	86.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Novatech BB-X000999 (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976)
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160511
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 22 '16 at 23:34
Run Duration	250 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$127 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	93.9% Outstanding	Memory 93.7 1-Core 134 2-Core 268 92% 165 Pts	4-Core 507 8-Core 741 78% 624 Pts	64-Core 739 46% 739 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 93.9% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake) 188,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% MSI(1462 7976) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4444 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	6.95% Terrible	Lighting 7.27 Reflection 10.7 Parallax 7.28 6% 8.41 fps	MRender 9.1 Gravity 6.43 Splatting 15.4 9% 10.3 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.95% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 175GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 387 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 235 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 62 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 11 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1561728577	86.1% Excellent	Read 512 Write 412 Mixed 417 99% 447 MB/s	4K Read 40.8 4K Write 78.1 4K Mixed 21.4 130% 46.8 MB/s	DQ Read 42.9 DQ Write 69 DQ Mixed 21.1 26% 44.3 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 168 4258 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2266 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 4491 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1604 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 61 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 173 173 81137 (C2) HDA temperature 115 105 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	60.7% Good	Read 117 Write 94.2 Mixed 97.6 77% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.16 75% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 84%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$20 89,637 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 466GB free Firmware: SC13 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 67321363 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1166 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 62 60 1659095 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 306 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 583 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 42 1426551537701 (C2) HDA temperature 37 58 68719476773 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 53 45 67321363 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	59.5% Above average	Read 110 Write 97.3 Mixed 96.8 76% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.77 4K Mixed 0.41 102% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 60%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$20 89,637 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 466GB free Firmware: SC13 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 200090532 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 46 46 55499 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 238520889 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 21749 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1241 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 94 94 6 (BE) vendor-specific 64 51 605552676 (C2) HDA temperature 36 49 64424509476 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 52 26 200090532 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	60.1% Good	Read 102 Write 108 Mixed 86.6 74% 98.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.36 90% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 60%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1.5TB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	48.9% Average	Read 115 Write 112 Mixed 103 141% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.93 4K Write 2.41 4K Mixed 0.27 94% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 49%
WDC WD50 00AVVS-63M8B0 500GB 318GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	31.4% Below average	Read 75.4 Write 66.7 Mixed 61.8 86% 68 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.89 4K Mixed 0.2 73% 0.88 MB/s

WDC WD50 00AACS-00ZUB0 500GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 70GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	25.5% Poor	Read 63 Write 45.7 Mixed 45.1 62% 51.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 2.06 4K Mixed 0.33 83% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB-$35 66,222 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	80.6% Excellent	MC Read 29.1 MC Write 30.8 MC Mixed 24.4 80% 28.1 GB/s	SC Read 18.9 SC Write 32.5 SC Mixed 26.4 74% 25.9 GB/s	Latency 60.6 66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback