Dell OptiPlex 7050

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics22.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell OptiPlex 7050
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 7050  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170619
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '19 at 11:30
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User BLZ-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Memory 84.1
1-Core 126
2-Core 239
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 676
69% 559 Pts
64-Core 685
42% 685 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820
Nvidia(10DE 1096) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 353.62
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Lighting 25.6
Reflection 27
Parallax 20.9
21% 24.5 fps
MRender 38.8
Gravity 25.5
Splatting 26.9
24% 30.4 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
787GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA810
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 142 140 132 141 138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 144
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 139
91% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
114% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 107%
WDC WD20 PURX-64P6ZY0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 119 120 128 127 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 150
Write 149
Mixed 86.8
SusWrite 124
170% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 56%
WDC WD10 PURX-64E5EY0 1TB
751GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 118 120 128 127 129 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46% Average
Read 122
Write 117
Mixed 45.3
SusWrite 124
136% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
30% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.1% Good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 17.6
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 22.1
60% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 7050 Builds (Compare 5,020 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 7050

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback