PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 6.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z600 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0AE8h |
Memory | 10 GB free of 16.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20090819 |
Uptime | 1.3 Days |
Run Date | Feb 05 '19 at 01:28 |
Run Duration | 187 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 50% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5520
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
57.9%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gainward(10B0 0401) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
6.51%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate ST31000524NS 1TB-$94
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KA05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 59 56 64 63 66 MB/s
|
51.3%
Above average
|
|||
Toshiba MD04ACA500 5TB-$154
699GB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 119 124 127 121 127 MB/s
|
82.3%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Expansion 1TB
282GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 25 28 29 28 30 MB/s
|
17.4%
Very poor
|
|||
WD easystore 25FC 2TB
399GB free, PID 25fc
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 14 15 14 15 MB/s
|
14.3%
Very poor
|
|||
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
4TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 13 14 14 14 15 MB/s
|
21.3%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 1.5TB
244GB free, PID 5071
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 13 13 12 13 MB/s
|
8.32%
Terrible
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples | 297x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples | 272x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples | 252x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 143x |
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 130x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 123x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 97x |
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 52x |
240G 240GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 69%, 5,700 samples | 36x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $87 |