Dell Precision T5600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell Precision T5600
MotherboardDell Precision T5600  (all builds)
Memory58.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140511
Uptime2 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '19 at 15:06
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 94
2-Core 184
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 716
64% 540 Pts
64-Core 1794
111% 1794 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Zotac(19DA 1511) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3975 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 418.81
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Lighting 151
Reflection 133
Parallax 140
123% 141 fps
MRender 197
Gravity 137
Splatting 108
116% 147 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 116%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB (2018)-$59
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101140WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,714
Write 1,269
Mixed 1,284
316% 1,422 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 46.3
160% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 618
DQ Write 406
DQ Mixed 543
397% 522 MB/s
Poor: 141% Great: 228%
WDC WDS120G2G0B-00EP 120GB
86GB free
Firmware: UI45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 57 53 61 58 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 290
Write 260
Mixed 198
SusWrite 55.2
45% 201 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 9.7
39% 11.1 MB/s
DQ Read 16.7
DQ Write 10.4
DQ Mixed 11.5
9% 12.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 53%
Samsung MZ7TD256HAFV-000L7 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: DXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 215 219 209 216 230 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 313
Write 244
Mixed 166
SusWrite 217
53% 235 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 30.3
4K Mixed 18.2
66% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 52.8
77% 142 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 80%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
680GB free
Firmware: MX6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 57 53 61 58 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 130
Write 118
Mixed 31
SusWrite 55.2
61% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
161% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 107%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140
2TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 57 53 61 58 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 154
Write 149
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 55.3
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
276% 2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix-00AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
85.1% Excellent
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 34.3
MC Mixed 30.7
98% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.9
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T5600 Builds (Compare 902 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Dell Precision T5600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback