ADD TO PC
BUILD

Sony VPCZ117GW

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Sony VPCZ117GW (all builds)
Motherboard	Sony VAIO
Memory	2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100531
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 19 '19 at 05:02
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	TWN-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 M 620 9,076 User benchmarks, average bench 42% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Memory 17.7 1-Core 26.6 2-Core 45.2 17% 29.8 Pts	4-Core 67.4 8-Core 73.6 9% 70.5 Pts	64-Core 72.8 4% 72.8 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330M 7,697 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sony(104D 905A) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.16.11.9024 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	0.53% Terrible	Lighting 0.73 Reflection 0.35 Parallax 0.75 1% 0.61 fps	MRender 0.76 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 0.48 0% 0.48 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 0.53% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Volume0 256GB 189 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 64 26 73 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Read 330 Write 259 Mixed 332 SusWrite 54.4 55% 244 MB/s	4K Read 10.4 4K Write 17.8 4K Mixed 12.5 41% 13.6 MB/s	DQ Read 153 DQ Write 174 DQ Mixed 170 126% 166 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 93%
Generic USB Flash Disk 32GB 181 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 12GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.8 10 12 9.8 12 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	7.08% Terrible	Read 26.3 Write 1.5 Mixed 2 SusWrite 7.4 9% 9.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.3 32% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.08% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	14.9% Very poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 4.3 15% 5.3 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 6.6 13% 4.4 GB/s	Latency 338 12% 338 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback