Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive375% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus WS-C621E-SAGE Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK WS-C621E-SAGE Series
Memory60 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '19 at 11:34
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6148
CPU1, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 56
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 197
63% 117 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 775
69% 583 Pts
64-Core 2,604
161% 2,604 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro GP100
Nvidia(10DE 11C3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1556 MHz, MLim: 357 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 418.81
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
107% Outstanding
Lighting 152
Reflection 122
Parallax 151
124% 142 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 133
80% 93.8 fps
Poor: 96%
This bench: 107%
Great: 122%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 10 Volume 973GB
805GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2993 2974 3004 2987 2999 3012 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
375% Outstanding
Read 2,167
Write 2,996
Mixed 1,110
SusWrite 2,995
524% 2,317 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 66.5
223% 78.8 MB/s
DQ Read 894
DQ Write 730
DQ Mixed 811
607% 812 MB/s
Poor: 93%
This bench: 375%
Great: 375%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 72ASS8G72LZ-2G6D2 1x31GB
1 of 12 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.6% Poor
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 7.1
22% 7.83 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7.3
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WS-C621E-SAGE Series Builds (Compare 151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 157%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 213%
UFO

System: Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $1,300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback