Asus PRIME Z270-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics34.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z270-P  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170906
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMar 02 '19 at 03:13
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$232
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Memory 92.4
1-Core 141
2-Core 282
95% 172 Pts
4-Core 536
8-Core 784
82% 660 Pts
64-Core 772
48% 772 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 96%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 1927 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (99th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (41 fps cap detected)
34.1% Below average
Lighting 42.4
Reflection 34.2
Parallax 40.3
35% 39 fps
MRender 41.7
Gravity 41.3
Splatting 39
33% 40.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 466 311 310 310 308 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 461
Mixed 437
SusWrite 363
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 60.3
160% 65.2 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 357
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 110%
Great: 129%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 712GB
468GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 88 92 91 90 91 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
108% Outstanding
Read 270
Write 263
Mixed 38
SusWrite 107
122% 170 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.8
201% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 108%
Great: 129%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1.5TB
882GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 90 90 90 240 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 352
Write 330
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 115
154% 214 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 1
227% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 134%
Great: 213%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2133 C15 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
73.5% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 22.2
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 23.9
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z270-P Builds (Compare 6,513 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270-P - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $800
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback