Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	80.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Memory 91.1 1-Core 86.1 2-Core 172 69% 116 Pts	4-Core 308 8-Core 332 42% 320 Pts	64-Core 330 20% 330 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 70%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HS-SSD-C100 480GB 644 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 381GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0423A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 420 413 418 418 409 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	80.5% Excellent	Read 485 Write 406 Mixed 355 SusWrite 415 93% 415 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 64.4 4K Mixed 20.2 90% 34.8 MB/s	DQ Read 103 DQ Write 287 DQ Mixed 25.3 68% 139 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 88%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00RWYB1 6TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 4.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 153 151 153 153 148 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	61.9% Good	Read 143 Write 139 Mixed 76.4 SusWrite 151 171% 127 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 126% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273CH0-CH9 M378B5273CH0-CH9 M378B5273CH0-CH9 16GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	50.1% Above average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 15.7 48% 17 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 16.4 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 65.6 61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,229x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	454x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	396x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	80x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	59x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	50x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278