Samsung RV420/RV520/RV720/E3530/S3530/E3420/E3520

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung RV420/RV520/RV720/E3530/S3530/E3420/E3520  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG RV420/RV520/RV720/E3530/S3530/E3420/E3520
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110903
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 04 '19 at 14:21
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
53.4% Above average
Memory 87.2
1-Core 20
2-Core 45.9
39% 51 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 41.7
14% 86.8 Pts
64-Core 139
9% 139 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C597) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.73% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 2.96
Parallax 1.31
2% 2.06 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.03
Splatting 3.39
2% 2.44 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.73%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST96023AS 60GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8.04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 14 15 18 20 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
8.1% Terrible
Read 12.2
Write 15
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 16
10% 14.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
32% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.1%
Great: 23%
Mass Storage Device 120GB
30GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 24 24 24 25 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 25.6
Write 21.4
Mixed 17.1
SusWrite 22.4
29% 21.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LNM 12/2011 LOGIN 0194 SH564568FH8NZPHSCR 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.6% Below average
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 15
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RV420/RV520/RV720/E3530/S3530/E3420/E3520 Builds (Compare 205 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung RV420/RV520/RV720/E3530/S3530/E3420/E3520

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $180
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback