Asus F2A85-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus F2A85-M  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140429
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 16 '16 at 15:09
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 76.6
2-Core 145
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 234
31% 234 Pts
64-Core 234
14% 234 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7560D
Asus(1043 8526) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
3.51% Terrible
Lighting 4.33
Reflection 6.23
Parallax 4.59
4% 5.05 fps
MRender 2.76
Gravity 3.97
Splatting 5.43
4% 4.05 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.51%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$58
907GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 139
Write 118
Mixed 111
92% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.08
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.29
113% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 76%
HP DG146BB976 147GB
136GB free
Firmware: HPDC
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 84.2
Write 85.7
Mixed 81.8
63% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.98
4K Write 2.32
4K Mixed 0.85
178% 1.38 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-039.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.6% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 7.3
21% 7.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 8.2
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F2A85-M Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A85-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $147
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback