Today's hottest deals

Biostar N61PB-M2S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.44% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar N61PB-M2S  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090903
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '19 at 22:52
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
45% Average
Memory 75.6
1-Core 44.7
2-Core 85
45% 68.4 Pts
4-Core 87.2
8-Core 86.3
12% 86.8 Pts
64-Core 87.6
5% 87.6 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670
XFX(1682 3060) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
6.44% Terrible
Lighting 7.83
Reflection 8.88
Parallax 6.88
6% 7.86 fps
MRender 9.05
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 9.35
7% 7.87 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.44%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ccdisk iSCSI 2TB
475GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 4.1 4.3 4.8 4.4 4.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 28% Great: 71%
WD WD2500AAJB-00J3A0 250GB
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00.02C01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 9.7 9.2 10 11 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
5.74% Terrible
Read 9.5
Write 10
Mixed 14
SusWrite 9.9
8% 10.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.3
80% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.74%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
25.2% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 9.3
24% 8.27 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.8
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 89
45% 89 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N61PB-M2S Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar N61PB-M2S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback