bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory20.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121126
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateMar 08 '19 at 08:50
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
None, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 72.6
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 147
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 436
46% 371 Pts
64-Core 451
28% 451 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 107GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 71 73 74 72 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 141
Write 107
Mixed 110
SusWrite 72.4
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 3.1
566% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 95%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 162GB
117GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 68 74 75 72 67 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.9% Above average
Read 132
Write 111
Mixed 114
SusWrite 71.9
80% 107 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 3.1
566% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 59%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 86GB
26GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 70 75 75 72 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 120
Write 119
Mixed 111
SusWrite 73.1
79% 106 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 3
559% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 92%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 32GB
30GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 64 73 74 72 67 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 130
Write 113
Mixed 101
SusWrite 70.8
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 3.2
579% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 32GB
null MHz
3968, 28800 MB
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
60.9% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 20.8
64% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.8
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 95.6
42% 95.6 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,499 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback