Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 12 '19 at 18:10
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 84.4
1-Core 127
2-Core 251
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 721
76% 609 Pts
64-Core 996
62% 996 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.7% Below average
Lighting 39.5
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 37.6
32% 36.1 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 36.3
31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid ST3320311CS 320GB
263GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 43 58 71 73 71 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.1% Poor
Read 41.6
Write 64.7
Mixed 45.6
SusWrite 59.5
39% 52.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 29%
Amd-raid Array 1 999GB
10GB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 96 99 100 101 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 173
Write 24.9
Mixed 54.1
SusWrite 98.8
64% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.7
200% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 176%
Maxtor Basics Desktop 1.5TB
1TB free, PID 7410
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 38.9
Write 38.8
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 40
50% 36.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
52.8% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.4
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 15.5
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,814 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $608
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback