Asus P8H61-M LX R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics4.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120530
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 16 '19 at 18:21
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Memory 0.93
1-Core 81.6
2-Core 113
32% 65.3 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 277
24% 203 Pts
64-Core 271
17% 271 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570
Asus(1043 0477) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.75% Terrible
Lighting 6.23
Reflection 6.23
Parallax 5.78
5% 6.08 fps
MRender 5.33
Gravity 5.23
Splatting 4.65
4% 5.07 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.75%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CGM Virtual Disk 0001 86GB
44GB free (System drive)
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
1.99% Terrible
Read 6.5
Write 3
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 0.4
3% 3.85 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 1.99%
Great: 29%
CGM Virtual Disk 40726 5TB
1.5TB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.4 4.4 3.7 4.1 4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.49% Terrible
Read 7.7
Write 6
Mixed 11.2
SusWrite 4.1
6% 7.25 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
74% 0.53 MB/s
CGM Virtual Disk 41238 500GB
363GB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 3.4 3.4 3.9 3.5 3.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
2.57% Terrible
Read 5.2
Write 6.3
Mixed 7.2
SusWrite 3.5
4% 5.55 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
68% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.57%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-550.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 6.4
20% 7.17 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 1.3
SC Mixed 2.9
7% 2.4 GB/s
Latency 497
8% 497 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LX R2.0 Builds (Compare 972 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback