Asus P8Q77-M

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	46% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8Q77-M (all builds)
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121108
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Mar 28 '19 at 19:08
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	Memory 93.8 1-Core 98 2-Core 181 74% 124 Pts	4-Core 311 8-Core 502 50% 406 Pts	64-Core 501 31% 501 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410 30,815 User benchmarks, average bench 53% Nvidia(10DE 1051) 3GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 416.94 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46% Average	Lighting 58.3 Reflection 57.2 Parallax 74.3 48% 63.2 fps	MRender 59.8 Gravity 61.8 Splatting 41.2 43% 54.2 fps
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 59%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force 3 240GB-$232 6,637 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 100 109 99 106 103 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	46.4% Average	Read 108 Write 180 Mixed 139 SusWrite 105 30% 133 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 46.6 4K Mixed 26.1 90% 31.1 MB/s	DQ Read 180 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 88.2 90% 147 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 67%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$55 23,775 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 261GB free Firmware: 01.01V02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 62 70 73 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	50.3% Above average	Read 104 Write 99.5 Mixed 76 SusWrite 70.9 65% 87.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 76%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465 6,270 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 856GB free Firmware: MJAOA580 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 127 121 129 128 136 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Read 95 Write 94.3 Mixed 21.3 SusWrite 129 61% 84.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 43,127 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	57.9% Above average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 20.3 MC Mixed 18.6 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 17.5 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 60.2 66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Q77-M Builds (Compare 158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Q77-M

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	43x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	23x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	17x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	12x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	12x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
SSDNow UV400 120GBKingston $35Bench 67%, 80,916 samples	6x
840 120GBSamsung $109Bench 61%, 51,792 samples	4x

RAM
16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 29%, 6,196 samples	7x
ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 47%, 2,312 samples	7x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $480

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16