Today's hottest deals

IBM System x3400 M3 Server -[7379AC1]-

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIBM System x3400 M3 Server -[7379AC1]-  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM 69Y4356
Memory33.1 GB free of 40 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100426
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 01 '19 at 01:41
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User URY-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620
Node 1 Socket 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
64% Good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 60.6
2-Core 121
57% 89.9 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 388
36% 303 Pts
64-Core 591
37% 591 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 64%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Asus(1043 841F) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
28.3% Poor
Lighting 34.1
Reflection 31.5
Parallax 47.4
28% 37.7 fps
MRender 40.4
Gravity 41.8
Splatting 28
29% 36.7 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 120GB-$45
7GB free
Firmware: O0803B5a
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 222
Write 218
Mixed 143
43% 195 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 36.5
4K Mixed 26.6
105% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 44.5
DQ Write 60.4
DQ Mixed 37.2
32% 47.4 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 91%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 598GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 42 48 50 48 51 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 236
Write 59.8
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 47.1
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1
169% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 95%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 1.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 2.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 19 19 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 443
Write 19.3
Mixed 36.3
SusWrite 18.3
93% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
141% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 132%
This bench: 132%
Great: 178%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
450GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 128 127 127 128 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 127
Write 37
Mixed 68
SusWrite 128
66% 90 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
216% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10x4GB
10 of 16 slots used
40GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
44.4% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 15.9
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.6
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback