Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 65% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	88.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	98% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170925
Uptime	14.9 Days
Run Date	Apr 03 '19 at 10:31
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173 264,837 User benchmarks, average bench 91% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Memory 80.2 1-Core 125 2-Core 257 84% 154 Pts	4-Core 490 8-Core 648 72% 569 Pts	64-Core 687 42% 687 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 101%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% MSI(1462 C303) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.17 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	88.9% Excellent	Lighting 111 Reflection 121 Parallax 56.9 91% 96.4 fps	MRender 96.6 Gravity 117 Splatting 101 86% 105 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 279 249 234 228 223 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	98% Outstanding	Read 453 Write 412 Mixed 308 SusWrite 249 80% 356 MB/s	4K Read 35.4 4K Write 84 4K Mixed 46.8 158% 55.4 MB/s	DQ Read 369 DQ Write 325 DQ Mixed 343 258% 346 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 124%
Gigabyte GP-GSM2NE8512GNTD 512GB 1,435 User benchmarks, average bench 117% 232GB free Firmware: E8TM14.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 197 242 195 128 172 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	94.2% Outstanding	Read 228 Write 333 Mixed 726 SusWrite 175 83% 366 MB/s	4K Read 34.1 4K Write 87.8 4K Mixed 42.2 152% 54.7 MB/s	DQ Read 946 DQ Write 291 DQ Mixed 234 273% 490 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 94.2% Great: 165%
WD WD10JPLX-00MBPT0 1TB 11,708 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 373GB free Firmware: 01.01H01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 98 98 98 93 86 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	57.4% Above average	Read 106 Write 99.7 Mixed 32 SusWrite 94.6 60% 82.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 109% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSEK.8FBD 2x8GB 3,030 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	62.7% Good	MC Read 25.3 MC Write 22.5 MC Mixed 20.9 65% 22.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 17.6 SC Mixed 16.5 44% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 80.1 50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 88%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	116x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	97x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	146x
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	91x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	85x

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $646

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16