Gigabyte GA-H170M-D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive66.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H170M-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 05 '19 at 04:10
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$48
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 118
2-Core 201
80% 137 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 323
42% 319 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4565
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.08% Terrible
Lighting 6.53
Reflection 9.54
Parallax 6.03
5% 7.37 fps
MRender 6.24
Gravity 5.27
Splatting 14.1
8% 8.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.08%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 240GB-$74
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O123
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 79 86 78 79 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 458
Write 414
Mixed 126
SusWrite 112
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 88.7
4K Mixed 11.9
96% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 38.4
106% 227 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 92%
WD WD2000FYYZ-01UL1 2TB
611GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 108 110 111 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 112
Write 109
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 109
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8213.C8FBD1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
39.4% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 10.8
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12.4
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H170M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 750 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H170M-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $408
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback