Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-HD2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-HD2  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20151224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 05 '19 at 21:03
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5300 APU-$36
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
48.4% Average
Memory 83.7
1-Core 58.1
2-Core 70.4
49% 70.7 Pts
4-Core 80
8-Core 85.2
11% 82.6 Pts
64-Core 86.6
5% 86.6 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7480D
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2201.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.06% Terrible
Lighting 2.57
Reflection 3.62
Parallax 2.22
2% 2.8 fps
MRender 2.29
Gravity 1.73
Splatting 3.09
2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.06%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingdian S400 120GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0724A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 41 43 54 54 53 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.3% Below average
Read 228
Write 205
Mixed 174
SusWrite 47.5
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 42.8
4K Mixed 7.6
54% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 24.4
DQ Write 93.7
DQ Mixed 13.9
24% 44 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 97%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
358GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 42 42 54 54 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 72.7
Write 65.6
Mixed 40.1
SusWrite 47.2
42% 56.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 60%
Seagate ST500VT000-1DK142 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: 0001SDC1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 63 81 79 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 72.8
Write 77.5
Mixed 36.4
SusWrite 70.4
47% 64.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
83% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 63%
SiI RAID 0 Set 0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 26 31 31 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
26% Poor
Read 60.9
Write 29.2
Mixed 34.6
SusWrite 28
28% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.2
282% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.4% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 7
20% 7.03 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 8.2
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-HD2 Builds (Compare 274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-HD2 - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $208
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback