Samsung R540/SA41/E452

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSamsung R540/SA41/E452  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG R540/SA41/E452
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100629
Uptime3 Days
Run DateApr 07 '19 at 23:39
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 450
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
43.8% Average
Memory 62.3
1-Core 67
2-Core 116
49% 81.9 Pts
4-Core 157
8-Core 108
19% 132 Pts
64-Core 108
7% 108 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4500
Sanyo(144D C07F) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.64% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 3
Parallax 1.56
2% 2.22 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 2.35
2% 1.76 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.64%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 73 77 72 69 77 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.2% Below average
Read 209
Write 48.4
Mixed 97.4
SusWrite 74.3
24% 107 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 12.6
57% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 93.2
DQ Mixed 31.7
47% 88.9 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 71%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 250GB
90GB free
Firmware: 0203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 29
Write 22
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 25.3
18% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 27%
Netac OnlyDisk 32GB
12GB free, PID 3200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 12 11 13 11 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
9.66% Terrible
Read 26.3
Write 19.5
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 12.4
25% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.4
86% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.66%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ21UE8BDS0-AE-F 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
24.4% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 10.4
24% 8.43 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical R540/SA41/E452 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung R540/SA41/E452

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback