Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	6.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	41.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Quad-Core AMD Opteron 2350 7 User benchmarks, average bench 38% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	33.8% Below average	Memory 46.2 1-Core 28.9 2-Core 58.7 29% 44.6 Pts	4-Core 116 8-Core 236 21% 176 Pts	64-Core 236 15% 236 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000 15,855 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.30 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	6.26% Terrible	Lighting 7.5 Reflection 8.77 Parallax 6.31 6% 7.53 fps	MRender 7.24 Gravity 8.07 Splatting 8.48 7% 7.93 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.26% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150 34,842 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 58 62 63 87 78 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.4% Average	Read 186 Write 97.8 Mixed 99.1 SusWrite 69.4 25% 113 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 42 4K Mixed 23.9 88% 29.8 MB/s	DQ Read 35.7 DQ Write 78.8 DQ Mixed 33.2 32% 49.2 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 110%
Trekstor USB-Stick QU 4GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 4GB free, PID 0006 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 11 11 11 10 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	8.37% Terrible	Read 29.6 Write 10.3 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 10.6 16% 14 MB/s	4K Read 7.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 28% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.37% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 8 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	14.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 5 MC Mixed 4.8 14% 4.87 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 3.3 11% 3.73 GB/s	Latency 175 23% 175 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	52x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	34x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	33x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87