Acer Aspire X3400

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive28.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire X3400  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire X3400
Memory3.5 GB free of 7 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100601
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateApr 12 '19 at 15:49
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 220
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
40.4% Average
Memory 68.3
1-Core 38.2
2-Core 75.3
40% 60.6 Pts
4-Core 75.3
8-Core 78
10% 76.7 Pts
64-Core 71.7
4% 71.7 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 418.91
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Lighting 18.3
Reflection 14.4
Parallax 17.3
15% 16.7 fps
MRender 16
Gravity 18.5
Splatting 19.9
15% 18.1 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial_ CT525MX300SS 525GB
213GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 125 111 141 140 150 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.7% Poor
Read 200
Write 124
Mixed 192
SusWrite 131
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 16.1
4K Mixed 10.6
35% 11.8 MB/s
DQ Read 44.5
DQ Write 30.1
DQ Mixed 34.6
26% 36.4 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 68%
S3u3 SSD 128GB
32GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 43 47 47 51 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18% Very poor
Read 149
Write 126
Mixed 113
SusWrite 45.2
24% 108 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 7.7
26% 8.1 MB/s
DQ Read 29.4
DQ Write 22.9
DQ Mixed 17.5
16% 23.3 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 18%
Great: 60%
Inateck ASM1153E 500GB
229GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 42 44 46 49 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
6.43% Terrible
Read 83.8
Write 82.1
Mixed 46.1
SusWrite 43.3
14% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
2% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 6.43%
Great: 76%
Sabrent AS2115 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 43 45 46 49 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.6% Above average
Read 149
Write 114
Mixed 115
SusWrite 44.5
79% 106 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 5.9
1,058% 6.67 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 57%
Seagate ST500VT000-1DK142 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 29 31 31 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 36.6
Write 35.3
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 30
24% 32.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT25664BA160B.C16F CT25664BA160B.C16F Kingston ACR128X64D3U1333C9 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 7GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048, 1024, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.2% Poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 8.2
20% 7.17 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire X3400 Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire X3400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback