Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$132 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	82.7% Excellent	Memory 94.9 1-Core 113 2-Core 225 83% 144 Pts	4-Core 381 8-Core 585 60% 483 Pts	64-Core 598 37% 598 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Nvidia(10DE 1138) 2GB CLim: 1505 MHz, MLim: 1840 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 39.8 Reflection 45.9 Parallax 35 32% 40.3 fps	Gravity 43.5 Splatting 38.1 36% 40.8 fps
Poor: 30% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z32070RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 75 34 61 39 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	35.2% Below average	Read 351 Write 261 Mixed 110 SusWrite 52.1 43% 194 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 16.1 4K Mixed 12.8 56% 16.4 MB/s	DQ Read 36.2 DQ Write 17.4 DQ Mixed 13.8 14% 22.5 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 86%
磁碟機 1TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 409GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 120 115 113 107 109 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	72.7% Very good	Read 140 Write 126 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 114 75% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 129% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 9,994 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	61.4% Good	MC Read 21.8 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 19.1 60% 21.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 20.6 SC Mixed 18.4 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 57.5 70% 57.5 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 62%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	11x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	10x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	10x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	7x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	7x

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $421