Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 18 '19 at 00:10
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 88.8
2-Core 179
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 351
48% 359 Pts
64-Core 355
22% 355 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Desktop V1 1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 844D) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
1.84% Terrible
Lighting 2.07
Reflection 2.88
Parallax 1.34
2% 2.1 fps
MRender 2.67
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 3.7
2% 2.49 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.84%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
321GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 356 352 349 296 288 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 355
Write 338
Mixed 308
SusWrite 332
75% 333 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 44.9
130% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 40.4
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 52.2
46% 65.4 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR5030ME68F9F1600 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.7% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 8.6
26% 9 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 9
23% 8.2 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 998 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $180
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback