Today's hottest deals

Intel S5500BC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardIntel S5500BC  (all builds)
Memory7.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20110909
Uptime56 Days
Run DateApr 23 '19 at 10:10
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620
CPU1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Memory 64.9
1-Core 38.9
2-Core 90.1
41% 64.6 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 402
40% 325 Pts
64-Core 594
37% 594 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
161GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 290 272 255 263 351 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 635
Write 429
Mixed 503
SusWrite 285
104% 463 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 52.1
4K Mixed 45.6
153% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 519
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 574
387% 473 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 109%
Great: 372%
Intel MegaSR 2TB
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 72 79 87 83 4.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 110
Write 107
Mixed 54.1
SusWrite 67.2
62% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 95%
Intel MegaSR 3TB
96GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 71 79 87 83 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 95.2
Write 88.6
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 80
59% 80.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.7% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 8.5
26% 9.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.2
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S5500BC Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel S5500BC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $76
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback