MSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7977
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977)  (all builds)
Memory20.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160722
Uptime5.7 Days
Run DateApr 24 '19 at 06:26
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 115
2-Core 215
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 609
59% 485 Pts
64-Core 561
35% 561 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.6% Average
Lighting 56.8
Reflection 64.4
Parallax 58.2
46% 59.8 fps
MRender 70.2
Gravity 57.3
Splatting 50
47% 59.2 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 257 120 112 105 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 478
Mixed 381
SusWrite 189
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 93.6
4K Mixed 54.2
181% 62.9 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 358
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 104%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
280GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 462 472 477 479 478 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 480
Mixed 405
SusWrite 468
104% 460 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 53.7
187% 66.2 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 359
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 122%
Great: 134%
Sandisk S3512G 512GB
119GB free
Firmware: 0223
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 144 146 146 147 147 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 327
Write 332
Mixed 166
SusWrite 146
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 25.8
4K Mixed 18.1
64% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 65.4
DQ Write 53.9
DQ Mixed 27.3
29% 48.9 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 119%
Asmt 2135 512GB
79GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 144 146 147 146 146 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 358
Write 354
Mixed 269
SusWrite 146
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 35.6
4K Mixed 26.4
86% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 25.7
55% 112 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 76%
SanDisk SD SDDR-289 64GB
16GB free, PID b6ba
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 70 82 71 78 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 86
Write 70.3
Mixed 43.2
SusWrite 75.4
90% 68.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2.6
144% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 38%
ST3000DM 008-2DM166 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 145 147 147 148 149 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 182
Write 136
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 145
178% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB-$182
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
73.1% Very good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 23
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 22.8
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977) Builds (Compare 4,993 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $704
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback