Today's hottest deals

Asrock X99X Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics62.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive76.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X99X Killer  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20151216
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 27 '19 at 07:40
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 87.6
1-Core 101
2-Core 200
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 598
58% 480 Pts
64-Core 772
48% 772 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$449
Zotac(19DA 1394) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 399.24
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
62.5% Good
Lighting 80
Reflection 82.2
Parallax 74
65% 78.7 fps
MRender 68.7
Gravity 73.3
Splatting 67.8
57% 69.9 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Z400s 256GB-$221
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2201000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 299 298 306 309 308 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 471
Write 294
Mixed 156
SusWrite 302
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 90.9
4K Mixed 14.1
103% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 82.8
101% 174 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 84%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
869GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 436 435 448 450 449 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 465
Mixed 447
SusWrite 442
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 99.6
4K Mixed 54.5
182% 64.5 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 354
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 119%
Great: 133%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$95
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 150 150 151 145 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 150
Write 166
Mixed 37
SusWrite 150
91% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 2800 2OZ 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
99.9% Outstanding
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 42.1
MC Mixed 37.2
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 19.4
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 100%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99X Killer Builds (Compare 280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99X Killer - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $759
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback