Today's hottest deals

Dell Latitude E5540

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemDell Latitude E5540  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0TG93N
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181008
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateApr 30 '19 at 15:11
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200U-$281
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 82.6
1-Core 74.8
2-Core 133
60% 96.9 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 180
24% 177 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Dell(1028 05E0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
3.27% Terrible
Lighting 3.43
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 5.47
3% 4.8 fps
MRender 6.29
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 6.57
4% 4.96 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.27%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-128L9S-11 2.5 7mm 128GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HC7110A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 307 305 307 303 313 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 438
Write 312
Mixed 253
SusWrite 306
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 54.9
4K Mixed 27.4
106% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 202
177% 264 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 97%
Marshal MAL2500SA-T72 500GB
390GB free
Firmware: MC102E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 100 100 100 100 100 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57% Above average
Read 99.4
Write 102
Mixed 31.7
SusWrite 99.2
60% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57%
Great: 57%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
181GB free, PID a007
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 66 66 64 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 65.6
Write 68
Mixed 31
SusWrite 65.3
77% 57.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.5% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 15.3
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 15
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E5540 Builds (Compare 900 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E5540

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback