Virtuozzo KVM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVirtuozzo KVM  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory14.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 03 '19 at 22:24
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon (Skylake, IBRS)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 72.2
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 195
68% 122 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 417
56% 417 Pts
64-Core 419
26% 419 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 76%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu Vz HARDDISK0 172GB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 48 49 49 49 49 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.4% Poor
Read 49.4
Write 50.9
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 48.7
37% 50 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.6
272% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Virtuozzo 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
72% Very good
MC Read 31
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 30.6
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 8.8
21% 7.4 GB/s
Latency 96.5
42% 96.5 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 72%
Great: 177%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback