MSI B350M MORTAR ARCTIC (MS-7A37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics58.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7A37
MotherboardMSI B350M MORTAR ARCTIC (MS-7A37)  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '19 at 20:44
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 41%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Memory 68.4
1-Core 101
2-Core 198
68% 123 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 360
34% 284 Pts
64-Core 341
21% 341 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (100th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (72 fps cap detected)
58.5% Above average
Lighting 71.9
Reflection 71.1
Parallax 68.1
59% 70.4 fps
MRender 71.6
Gravity 69.4
Splatting 72.2
58% 71.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SNAT-256G-1006 256GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2311006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 282 295 275 304 307 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 382
Write 300
Mixed 213
SusWrite 282
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 70.9
4K Mixed 13.4
84% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 82.5
93% 155 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 280 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
41.5% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 14.4
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 13
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B350M MORTAR ARCTIC (MS-7A37) Builds (Compare 269 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B350M MORTAR ARCTIC (MS-7A37)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $294
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback