ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell Precision 7510

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	44% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Dell Precision 7510 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 0M1YNP
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160428
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 13 '16 at 07:13
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6920HQ 3,282 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	79.7% Very good	Memory 90.5 1-Core 115 2-Core 222 81% 142 Pts	4-Core 372 8-Core 600 60% 486 Pts	64-Core 600 37% 600 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 79%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake) 213,495 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Dell(1028 06D9) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4483 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.2% Terrible	Lighting 6.5 Reflection 9.54 Parallax 6.59 5% 7.54 fps	MRender 8.14 Gravity 5.97 Splatting 13.4 8% 9.18 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.2% Great: 6%
Nvidia Quadro M1000M 6,377 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Dell(1028 06D9) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6179 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Lighting 17.7 Reflection 14.6 Parallax 15.9 14% 16.1 fps	MRender 21.7 Gravity 14.4 Splatting 15.7 14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 14%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BF256A5 SA 256GB 47 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: LB1i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 146 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 161 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 12 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 913088 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 4480 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 31 100 77312098335 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 12 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 106 100 11193349 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 30329 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 50 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 30329 (F2) Unknown 100 100 31098 (F9) Unknown 100 100 3338	44% Average	Read 322 Write 116 Mixed 120 40% 186 MB/s	4K Read 7 4K Write 67.2 4K Mixed 6.7 55% 27 MB/s	DQ Read 269 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 3.17 52% 128 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA451S6AFR8N-TF 2x4GB 17,761 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	MC Read 26.9 MC Write 26.9 MC Mixed 20.3 71% 24.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 27.1 SC Mixed 21.4 62% 21.7 GB/s	Latency 66.6 60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 74%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Precision 7510 Builds (Compare 2,438 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision 7510

CPU
Core i7-6820HQIntelBench 60%, 33,920 samples	1,647x
Core i7-6920HQIntelBench 70%, 3,282 samples	313x
Xeon E3-1535M v5IntelBench 69%, 1,588 samples	226x

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	1,327x
Quadro M2000MNvidiaBench 16%, 5,864 samples	507x
Quadro M1000MNvidiaBench 13%, 6,377 samples	292x

SSD
THNSN5512GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshibaBench 122%, 19,561 samples	82x
PM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 140%, 7,011 samples	56x
PM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 120%, 13,766 samples	45x

RAM
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 55,289 samples	349x
16ATF1G64HZ-2G1B1 2x8GBMicronBench 71%, 5,035 samples	265x
HMA82GS6MFR8N-TF 2x16GBHynixBench 69%, 5,073 samples	158x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback