Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics89.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive79.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '19 at 12:48
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-7820X-$476
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
115% Outstanding
SC Int 123
SC Float 140
SC Mixed 136
106% 133 Pts
QC Int 527
QC Float 556
QC Mixed 540
123% 541 Pts
MC Int 1,324
MC Float 1555
MC Mixed 1,472
217% 1,450 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 115%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$808
EVGA(3842 6391) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Lighting 206
Reflection 251
Parallax 374
82% 277 fps
MRender 181
Gravity 292
Splatting 172
94% 215 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 176%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 1TB-$110
754GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 362 382 443 456 456 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 471
Write 473
Mixed 400
SusWrite 404
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 32.6
4K Mixed 34
102% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 72.5
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 89.5
67% 87.7 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 123%
WD Black 5TB (2015)-$294
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 101 117 110 110 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 188
Write 218
Mixed 110
SusWrite 111
115% 157 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1.1
420% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 113%
WD Se 2TB (2013)-$114
73GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 84 84 86 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 92.5
Write 84.5
Mixed 65
SusWrite 84.8
60% 81.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 51%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$85
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
54.9% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 15.1
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 10.3
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 98%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 2,252 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $1,318
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $365Nvidia GTX 1070 $335Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $85
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $144Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $280Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $646SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $85SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback