Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	52.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20160531
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	May 09 '19 at 18:51
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8300-$168 49,767 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	66.7% Good	Memory 89.1 1-Core 72.3 2-Core 143 62% 101 Pts	4-Core 241 8-Core 362 38% 302 Pts	64-Core 360 22% 360 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Sapphire(174B E347) CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 16.6 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	52.3% Above average	Lighting 65.8 Reflection 67.8 Parallax 89.2 54% 74.3 fps	MRender 68 Gravity 61.5 Splatting 55.7 50% 61.7 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 160GB-$46 8,198 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: P22OABEA SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 40 42 30 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	21.6% Poor	Read 38.3 Write 38.2 Mixed 25.4 SusWrite 36.5 26% 34.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 39%
Samsung HM250JI 250GB 961 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 105GB free Firmware: HS100-10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 44 45 43 36 34 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	26.4% Poor	Read 51.5 Write 51.2 Mixed 33.6 SusWrite 40.1 32% 44.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 32%
Hitachi HTS722012K9SA00 120GB-$55 111 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 84GB free Firmware: DCCOC74A SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 31 29 21 30 26 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	20.6% Poor	Read 43.8 Write 46.5 Mixed 31.6 SusWrite 27.5 28% 37.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown GR1333D364L9/4G Corsair CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.1% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 14.7 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 11.3 28% 9.63 GB/s	Latency 68.3 58% 68.3 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 798 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18

CPU
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	197x
FX-8350AMD $85Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	193x
FX-8320AMD $95Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	104x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	65x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	53x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	33x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	26x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	17x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	28x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	16x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $192

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $296	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350