Today's hottest deals

HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180504
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '19 at 16:28
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 91%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$104
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 84
1-Core 107
2-Core 165
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 559
51% 430 Pts
64-Core 590
36% 590 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 18E7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.02% Terrible
Lighting 4.13
Reflection 7
Parallax 7.72
3% 6.28 fps
MRender 8.24
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 8.17
5% 6.29 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.02%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitach HTS722010K9SA00 100GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC2ZC75A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 27 32 33 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.8% Poor
Read 58.3
Write 34.7
Mixed 26.1
SusWrite 27.9
27% 36.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 25%
WD k SDSSD External 240GB
116GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 42 42 42 43 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 41.1
Write 42.7
Mixed 41.2
SusWrite 42.3
58% 41.8 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 18.1
4K Mixed 13.7
1,126% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 14.1
DQ Write 22
DQ Mixed 16.6
1,365% 17.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
31.4% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 8.8
28% 9.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 9.6
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 4,526 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback