ADD TO PC
BUILD

Sony VPCF21AFX

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	Sony VPCF21AFX (all builds)
Motherboard	Sony VAIO
Memory	2.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20110210
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	May 19 '19 at 13:09
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2720QM-$85 7,798 User benchmarks, average bench 58% N/A, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	43.1% Average	Memory 72.7 1-Core 20.9 2-Core 42.5 34% 45.4 Pts	4-Core 76 8-Core 164 14% 120 Pts	64-Core 286 18% 286 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 540M 15,328 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sony(104D 9086) 1GB CLim: 672 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.54 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	1.72% Terrible	Lighting 1.83 Reflection 2.46 Parallax 3.38 2% 2.56 fps	MRender 3.57 Gravity 1.37 Splatting 2.96 2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.72% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 66 60 56 52 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	42.9% Average	Read 419 Write 331 Mixed 122 SusWrite 82.6 53% 238 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 32.8 4K Mixed 10.3 58% 20.4 MB/s	DQ Read 140 DQ Write 44.3 DQ Mixed 63.2 54% 82.6 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 82%
Ricoh SD/MMC Disk Device 129GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 79GB free Firmware: 01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Read 38.8 Write 17.7 Mixed 24.3 SusWrite 19.3 19% 25 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1 324% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 17%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 2.5TB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	22.1% Poor	Read 32.5 Write 28 Mixed 24 SusWrite 27.6 37% 28 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 1 162% 2 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	38% Below average	MC Read 14 MC Write 14.8 MC Mixed 13.5 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 5.2 19% 6.6 GB/s	Latency 95.2 42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback