Asus P8P67-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics90.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive56.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67-M  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '19 at 18:43
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 32%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 76.7
1-Core 72.1
2-Core 126
56% 91.8 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 266
31% 243 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.5% Outstanding
Lighting 111
Reflection 128
Parallax 103
91% 114 fps
MRender 103
Gravity 127
Splatting 102
90% 111 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GOODRAM 240GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 88 76 8.6 23 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 450
Write 416
Mixed 336
SusWrite 57.2
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 26.7
81% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 177
139% 198 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
111GB free
Firmware: SD15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 102 103 101 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 105
Write 98
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 102
66% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 59%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
16GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 46 47 45 46 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
24.5% Poor
Read 39.7
Write 45.7
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 45.7
28% 38 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
65% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
43% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 14.5
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 10.6
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 87
46% 87 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67-M Builds (Compare 393 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $564
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback