Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAsus WS-C621E-SAGE Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK WS-C621E-SAGE Series
Memory42.8 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180921
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 24 '19 at 16:50
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4114
CPU1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 76.5
1-Core 93.9
2-Core 187
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 675
61% 512 Pts
64-Core 2,192
136% 2,192 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 118
Parallax 122
104% 123 fps
MRender 178
Gravity 127
Splatting 101
107% 135 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$60
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 268 278 281 279 281 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 447
Mixed 350
SusWrite 289
87% 389 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 73.2
4K Mixed 39.5
138% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 228
206% 313 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9ASF51272PZ-2G6E1 12x4GB
12 of 12 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
93.8% Outstanding
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 48.2
MC Mixed 34.8
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 94%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WS-C621E-SAGE Series Builds (Compare 152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 157%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 213%
UFO

System: Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $1,215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback