Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	63% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675 4,275 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	69.4% Good	Memory 76.2 1-Core 83.6 2-Core 168 63% 109 Pts	4-Core 336 8-Core 672 59% 504 Pts	64-Core 1,208 75% 1,208 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Gigabyte(1458 37D1) ≥ 4GB; CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	63% Good	Lighting 67.7 Reflection 84.6 Parallax 107 55% 86.6 fps	MRender 123 Gravity 96.3 Splatting 76.3 78% 98.7 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ REVODRIVE3 X2 960GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 721GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 504 468 459 466 457 465 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 94%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 136GB free Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1021 591 397 404 396 405 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	214% Outstanding	Read 1,434 Write 1243 Mixed 1,093 SusWrite 536 241% 1,076 MB/s	4K Read 59.3 4K Write 142 4K Mixed 77.6 264% 92.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,004 DQ Write 889 DQ Mixed 948 710% 947 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 214% Great: 280%
Maxtor STM3320820AS 320GB 4,234 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 201GB free Firmware: 3.AAE SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 70 72 70 72 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	41.2% Average	Read 72.3 Write 41.5 Mixed 43.3 SusWrite 70.9 42% 57 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 44%
Seagate ST3200822AS 200GB-$33 4,227 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 100GB free Firmware: 3.01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 20 53 54 52 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Read 3.5 Write 3.8 Mixed 5.3 SusWrite 39.4 9% 13 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 38% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B5270CH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B5270CH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B5270CH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B5270CH0-YH9 50GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	47.6% Average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 20.2 53% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.3 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 6.2 16% 5.7 GB/s	Latency 87.8 46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	318x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	188x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	179x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	15x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16